The verdict
Roger Tuivasa-Sheck has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonJack Wighton43%of decided measures15measures wonRoger Tuivasa-Sheck
Games played: 18 for Jack Wighton, 10 for Roger Tuivasa-Sheck. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Wighton |  Roger Tuivasa-Sheck |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.22Better | 0.20 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.28 | 0.50Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33 | 0.40Better |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 1.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.22 | 0.40Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.61 | 2.10Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.28 | 0.30Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.3 | 20.8Better |
| Passes per Game | 5.4Better | 4.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 101.4 | 139.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 107.7 | 144.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.6 | 46.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 12.4 | 15.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.19 | 9.13Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.47 | 7.75Better |
| Tackles per Game | 12.4Better | 6.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.2Better | 75.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.19Better | 0.25 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.0 | 1.1Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 18 | 10 |