The verdict
Nick Meaney has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Nick Meaney leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonJack Wighton5%of decided measures10measures wonNick Meaney
Games played: 18 for Jack Wighton, 20 for Nick Meaney. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Wighton |  Nick Meaney |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.22 | 0.25Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.28Better | 0.15 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33Better | 0.10 |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 7.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.22 | 0.40Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.61 | 2.05Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.28 | 0.80Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.3Better | 16.5 |
| Passes per Game | 5.4Better | 3.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 101.4Better | 92.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 107.7Better | 93.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.6Better | 30.3 |
| Runs per Game | 12.4Better | 11.8 |
| Metres per Run | 8.19Better | 7.86 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.47 | 7.64Better |
| Tackles per Game | 12.4 | 12.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.2 | 80.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.19 | 0.16Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 81.1 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.0 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.4Better |
| Games played | 18 | 20 |