2026 NRL player comparison

Dane GagaivsMoses Suli

Knights · Centre versus Dragons · Centre

Compare another player

The verdict

Dane Gagai has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Dane Gagai leads by 30%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

13measures wonDane Gagai30%of decided measures7measures wonMoses Suli

Games played: 22 for Dane Gagai, 16 for Moses Suli. Compared positions: Centre.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricKnights logoDane GagaiDragons logoMoses Suli
Tries per Game0.230.25Better
Try Assists per Game0.45Better0.31
Line Break Assists per Game0.82Better0.50
Points per Game0.91.0Better
Line Breaks per Game0.45Better0.13
Tackle Breaks per Game3.95Better2.44
Offloads per Game1.09Better0.50
Possessions per Game21.5Better15.0
Passes per Game7.1Better2.7
Run Metres per Game114.5Better108.6
Metres Gained per Game121.0Better109.6
Post-Contact Metres per Game42.842.8
Runs per Game13.4Better11.1
Metres per Run8.549.76Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.909.55Better
Tackles per Game14.3Better10.3
Tackle Efficiency78.387.8Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.220.11Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.060.05Better
Kick Returns per Game0.2Better0.1
Bombs Caught per Game0.2Better0.0
Games played2216