The verdict
Tino Fa'asuamaleaui has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tino Fa'asuamaleaui leads by 68%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonTevita Tatola68%of decided measures16measures wonTino Fa'asuamaleaui
Games played: 24 for Tevita Tatola, 21 for Tino Fa'asuamaleaui. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Tevita Tatola |  Tino Fa'asuamaleaui |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.08 | 0.10Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.14Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 0.3 | 0.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.19Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.42 | 2.57Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.04 | 0.90Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.2 | 19.8Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.1 | 3.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 106.8 | 140.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 106.8 | 140.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 39.4 | 56.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 12.8 | 16.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.35 | 8.78Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.05 | 9.12Better |
| Tackles per Game | 26.7 | 33.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.6Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05Better | 0.09 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 24 | 21 |