The verdict
Tevita Naufahu has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Tevita Naufahu leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonSialetili Faeamani14%of decided measures12measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 13 for Sialetili Faeamani, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Sialetili Faeamani |  Tevita Naufahu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.38Better | 0.23 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.08Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.5Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.31 | 0.77Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.00 | 3.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.23Better | 0.08 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.8Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 1.8 | 1.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 99.5 | 108.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 99.5 | 112.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 36.8Better | 34.0 |
| Runs per Game | 11.5Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.68 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.32 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 3.3Better | 2.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 75.4 | 79.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.26 | 0.19Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.6 | 1.5Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 5.2 | 13.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 13 | 13 |