The verdict
Reuben Cotter has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Reuben Cotter leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonReuben Cotter22%of decided measures7measures wonVictor Radley
Games played: 21 for Reuben Cotter, 16 for Victor Radley. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Reuben Cotter |  Victor Radley |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14Better | 0.06 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.13Better |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.81Better | 0.75 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.19Better | 0.06 |
| Possessions per Game | 12.5 | 20.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.9 | 11.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 70.1 | 78.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 70.1 | 80.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 27.5Better | 27.4 |
| Runs per Game | 8.2 | 9.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.51Better | 8.02 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.86Better | 8.35 |
| Tackles per Game | 39.8Better | 31.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 88.5Better | 87.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10 | 0.07Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.03 |
| Games played | 21 | 16 |