The verdict
Oliver Pascoe has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Oliver Pascoe leads by 58%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonOliver Pascoe58%of decided measures4measures wonPhoenix Crossland
Games played: 20 for Oliver Pascoe, 22 for Phoenix Crossland. Compared positions: Hooker.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Oliver Pascoe |  Phoenix Crossland |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25Better | 0.14 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.35Better | 0.09 |
| Points per Game | 1.1Better | 0.5 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.25Better | 0.05 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.20Better | 0.14 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.55Better | 0.05 |
| Possessions per Game | 89.6Better | 77.4 |
| Passes per Game | 84.3Better | 74.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 46.0Better | 11.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 50.0 | 53.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 12.3Better | 2.3 |
| Runs per Game | 5.4Better | 1.4 |
| Metres per Run | 8.52Better | 8.50 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | 5.00 |
| Tackles per Game | 39.6 | 44.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.2 | 91.7Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.00Better |
| Dummy-Half Runs per Game | 3.7Better | 0.4 |
| Dummy-Half Metres per Game | 31.2Better | 3.8 |
| Games played | 20 | 22 |