The verdict
Will Penisini has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Will Penisini leads by 37%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonNick Meaney37%of decided measures13measures wonWill Penisini
Games played: 20 for Nick Meaney, 12 for Will Penisini. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Nick Meaney |  Will Penisini |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25 | 0.33Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.42Better |
| Points per Game | 7.6Better | 1.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.40Better | 0.33 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.05 | 3.50Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.80 | 1.00Better |
| Possessions per Game | 16.5 | 17.2Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.8Better | 2.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 92.4 | 141.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 93.4 | 141.3Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 30.3 | 54.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.8 | 14.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.86 | 9.75Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.64 | 9.34Better |
| Tackles per Game | 12.4Better | 12.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.2 | 80.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 81.1 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.5Better | 0.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 20 | 12 |