The verdict
Nat Butcher has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Nat Butcher leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonNat Butcher22%of decided measures7measures wonReuben Cotter
Games played: 22 for Nat Butcher, 21 for Reuben Cotter. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Nat Butcher |  Reuben Cotter |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.05 | 0.14Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.05Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.09 | 0.10Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.73 | 0.81Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.27Better | 0.19 |
| Possessions per Game | 15.1Better | 12.5 |
| Passes per Game | 1.3 | 3.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 117.9Better | 70.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 118.3Better | 70.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.2Better | 27.5 |
| Runs per Game | 13.5Better | 8.2 |
| Metres per Run | 8.70Better | 8.51 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.14 | 8.86Better |
| Tackles per Game | 33.7 | 39.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 93.9Better | 88.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.02Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Games played | 22 | 21 |