2026 NRL player comparison

Moses LeotavsTevita Tatola

Panthers · Prop versus Rabbitohs · Prop

Compare another player

The verdict

Tevita Tatola has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Tevita Tatola leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

7measures wonMoses Leota22%of decided measures11measures wonTevita Tatola

Games played: 24 for Moses Leota, 24 for Tevita Tatola. Compared positions: Prop.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricPanthers logoMoses LeotaRabbitohs logoTevita Tatola
Tries per Game0.040.08Better
Try Assists per Game0.04Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.17Better0.00
Points per Game0.20.3Better
Line Breaks per Game0.040.04
Tackle Breaks per Game1.08Better0.42
Offloads per Game0.63Better0.04
Possessions per Game13.814.2Better
Passes per Game2.5Better1.1
Run Metres per Game97.9106.8Better
Metres Gained per Game98.7106.8Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game34.339.4Better
Runs per Game10.912.8Better
Metres per Run8.97Better8.35
Metres per Hit-Up8.69Better8.05
Tackles per Game25.026.7Better
Tackle Efficiency91.391.6Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.070.05Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.01Better
Games played2424