The verdict
Zane Harrison has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Zane Harrison leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonKyle Flanagan5%of decided measures10measures wonZane Harrison
Games played: 23 for Kyle Flanagan, 15 for Zane Harrison. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kyle Flanagan |  Zane Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.30 | 0.40Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.22 | 0.53Better |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.1 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.07Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.35Better | 0.33 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.09 | 0.13Better |
| Possessions per Game | 45.1Better | 36.1 |
| Passes per Game | 37.2Better | 26.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 28.5 | 29.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 186.4 | 239.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 6.1 | 7.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 4.1 | 4.4Better |
| Metres per Run | 6.89Better | 6.67 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 18.3Better | 16.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.1Better | 83.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 80.0 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Kicks per Game | 4.5 | 5.9Better |
| Kick Metres per Game | 157.9 | 210.4Better |
| Games played | 23 | 15 |