The verdict
Tom Dearden has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Tom Dearden leads by 78%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
2measures wonKyle Flanagan78%of decided measures16measures wonTom Dearden
Games played: 23 for Kyle Flanagan, 13 for Tom Dearden. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kyle Flanagan |  Tom Dearden |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04 | 0.15Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.30 | 1.08Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.22 | 1.31Better |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.46Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.35 | 2.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.09 | 0.15Better |
| Possessions per Game | 45.1 | 54.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 37.2 | 43.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 28.5 | 86.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 186.4 | 254.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 6.1 | 24.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 4.1 | 10.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 6.89 | 8.17Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 18.3 | 22.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.1Better | 86.7 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 80.0 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Kicks per Game | 4.5 | 5.6Better |
| Kick Metres per Game | 157.9 | 168.9Better |
| Games played | 23 | 13 |