2026 NRL player comparison

Kyle FlanaganvsToby Rodwell

Dragons · Halfback versus Roosters · Halfback

Compare another player

The verdict

Kyle Flanagan has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Kyle Flanagan leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

14measures wonKyle Flanagan33%of decided measures7measures wonToby Rodwell

Games played: 23 for Kyle Flanagan, 5 for Toby Rodwell. Compared positions: Halfback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricDragons logoKyle FlanaganRoosters logoToby Rodwell
Tries per Game0.040.20Better
Try Assists per Game0.30Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.22Better0.20
Points per Game0.61.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.040.20Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.350.80Better
Offloads per Game0.090.20Better
Possessions per Game45.1Better10.0
Passes per Game37.2Better5.6
Run Metres per Game28.5Better16.0
Metres Gained per Game186.4Better85.6
Post-Contact Metres per Game6.17.2Better
Runs per Game4.1Better2.0
Metres per Run6.898.00Better
Metres per Hit-Up––
Tackles per Game18.3Better7.0
Tackle Efficiency90.1Better83.3
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.08Better0.20
Conversion Accuracy80.0Better40.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0–
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.12
Kicks per Game4.5Better1.6
Kick Metres per Game157.9Better69.4
Games played235