2026 NRL player comparison

Josh FeledyvsRoger Tuivasa-Sheck

Sea Eagles · Centre versus Warriors · Centre

Compare another player

The verdict

Roger Tuivasa-Sheck has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck leads by 40%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

6measures wonJosh Feledy40%of decided measures14measures wonRoger Tuivasa-Sheck

Games played: 18 for Josh Feledy, 10 for Roger Tuivasa-Sheck. Compared positions: Centre.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSea Eagles logoJosh FeledyWarriors logoRoger Tuivasa-Sheck
Tries per Game0.28Better0.20
Try Assists per Game0.110.50Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.110.40Better
Points per Game1.1Better1.0
Line Breaks per Game0.220.40Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.062.10Better
Offloads per Game0.110.30Better
Possessions per Game7.320.8Better
Passes per Game1.94.9Better
Run Metres per Game43.8139.7Better
Metres Gained per Game45.0144.7Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game16.046.7Better
Runs per Game5.315.3Better
Metres per Run8.229.13Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.00Better7.75
Tackles per Game6.06.0
Tackle Efficiency83.1Better75.0
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.13Better0.25
Conversion Accuracy–100.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.05Better0.06
Kick Returns per Game0.11.1Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.00.2Better
Games played1810