2026 NRL player comparison

Jonathan SuavsWill Warbrick

Bulldogs · Wing versus Storm · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Will Warbrick has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 81%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

2measures wonJonathan Sua81%of decided measures19measures wonWill Warbrick

Games played: 9 for Jonathan Sua, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricBulldogs logoJonathan SuaStorm logoWill Warbrick
Tries per Game0.110.89Better
Try Assists per Game0.000.06Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.000.00
Points per Game0.43.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.110.61Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.673.00Better
Offloads per Game0.110.78Better
Possessions per Game13.419.7Better
Passes per Game1.11.6Better
Run Metres per Game92.3137.9Better
Metres Gained per Game92.3137.9Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game33.250.4Better
Runs per Game11.114.7Better
Metres per Run8.319.37Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.438.65Better
Tackles per Game3.75.4Better
Tackle Efficiency76.778.9Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.210.20Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.08Better0.09
Kick Returns per Game1.8Better1.5
Kick Return Metres per Game18.218.3Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.61.6Better
Games played918