2026 NRL player comparison

Jock MaddenvsKyle Flanagan

Wests Tigers · Halfback versus Dragons · Halfback

Compare another player

The verdict

Too close to call

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

10measures wonJock Madden0%of decided measures10measures wonKyle Flanagan

Games played: 18 for Jock Madden, 23 for Kyle Flanagan. Compared positions: Halfback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWests Tigers logoJock MaddenDragons logoKyle Flanagan
Tries per Game0.06Better0.04
Try Assists per Game0.280.30Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.44Better0.22
Points per Game3.8Better0.6
Line Breaks per Game0.06Better0.04
Tackle Breaks per Game0.170.35Better
Offloads per Game0.000.09Better
Possessions per Game44.745.1Better
Passes per Game31.437.2Better
Run Metres per Game35.6Better28.5
Metres Gained per Game377.6Better186.4
Post-Contact Metres per Game4.46.1Better
Runs per Game4.9Better4.1
Metres per Run7.19Better6.89
Metres per Hit-Up––
Tackles per Game15.818.3Better
Tackle Efficiency85.390.1Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.150.08Better
Conversion Accuracy66.780.0Better
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.010.01
Kicks per Game10.4Better4.5
Kick Metres per Game342.2Better157.9
Games played1823