The verdict
Tevita Naufahu has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Tevita Naufahu leads by 10%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonJeral Skelton10%of decided measures11measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 17 for Jeral Skelton, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jeral Skelton |  Tevita Naufahu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.47Better | 0.23 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.08Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.9Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.41 | 0.77Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.76 | 3.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.47Better | 0.08 |
| Possessions per Game | 15.1Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 1.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 101.8 | 108.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 103.5 | 112.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 30.8 | 34.0Better |
| Runs per Game | 12.8Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 7.94 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.49 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 2.3Better | 2.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 56.5 | 79.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.56 | 0.19Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 14.8Better | 13.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 17 | 13 |