The verdict
James Tedesco has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, James Tedesco leads by 70%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonJames Tedesco70%of decided measures3measures wonTrai Fuller
Games played: 17 for James Tedesco, 12 for Trai Fuller. Compared positions: Fullback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  James Tedesco |  Trai Fuller |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.65Better | 0.17 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.82Better | 0.17 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.53Better | 0.25 |
| Points per Game | 2.6Better | 0.7 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.88Better | 0.08 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.82Better | 3.17 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.59Better | 0.67 |
| Possessions per Game | 35.1Better | 16.1 |
| Passes per Game | 17.6Better | 5.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 192.2Better | 105.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 201.7Better | 108.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.9Better | 31.6 |
| Runs per Game | 19.0Better | 10.7 |
| Metres per Run | 10.12Better | 9.84 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.00 | 12.00Better |
| Tackles per Game | 3.3 | 4.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 76.7 | 79.1Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.03 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 4.6Better | 3.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 50.5Better | 36.6 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Games played | 17 | 12 |