The verdict
James Fisher-Harris has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, James Fisher-Harris leads by 37%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonJames Fisher-Harris37%of decided measures6measures wonMoses Leota
Games played: 21 for James Fisher-Harris, 24 for Moses Leota. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  James Fisher-Harris |  Moses Leota |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14Better | 0.04 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05Better | 0.04 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.17Better |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.14Better | 0.04 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.24Better | 1.08 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.62 | 0.63Better |
| Possessions per Game | 19.2Better | 13.8 |
| Passes per Game | 3.4Better | 2.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 135.9Better | 97.9 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 135.9Better | 98.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 45.3Better | 34.3 |
| Runs per Game | 16.2Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.37 | 8.97Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.81 | 8.69Better |
| Tackles per Game | 32.0Better | 25.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3 | 91.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.07Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.02 |
| Games played | 21 | 24 |