The verdict
Jamal Fogarty has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Jamal Fogarty leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonJamal Fogarty18%of decided measures9measures wonNiwhai Puru
Games played: 22 for Jamal Fogarty, 6 for Niwhai Puru. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jamal Fogarty |  Niwhai Puru |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.18Better | 0.17 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.86Better | 0.17 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.32Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 6.8Better | 2.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.18Better | 0.17 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.82Better | 0.50 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.14 | 0.17Better |
| Possessions per Game | 61.0Better | 48.3 |
| Passes per Game | 43.4Better | 34.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 40.1 | 41.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 553.5Better | 334.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 10.8 | 11.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 5.5Better | 5.2 |
| Metres per Run | 7.35 | 8.00Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 21.0 | 30.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.9 | 86.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13 | 0.09Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 71.3 | 100.0Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 90.0 | 100.0Better |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.02 |
| Kicks per Game | 14.0Better | 8.2 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 513.4Better | 293.0 |
| Games played | 22 | 6 |