The verdict
Paul Alamoti has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Paul Alamoti leads by 40%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonJack Wighton40%of decided measures14measures wonPaul Alamoti
Games played: 18 for Jack Wighton, 21 for Paul Alamoti. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Wighton |  Paul Alamoti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.22Better | 0.19 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.28Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 2.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.22 | 0.52Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.61 | 3.19Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.28 | 1.29Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.3Better | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 5.4Better | 3.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 101.4 | 129.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 107.7 | 132.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.6 | 48.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 12.4 | 13.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.19 | 9.40Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.47 | 9.25Better |
| Tackles per Game | 12.4 | 13.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.2 | 78.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.19Better | 0.22 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 86.7 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.0 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 18 | 21 |