2026 NRL player comparison

Jack WightonvsLeka Halasima

Rabbitohs · Centre versus Warriors · Centre

Compare another player

The verdict

Leka Halasima has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Leka Halasima leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

9measures wonJack Wighton14%of decided measures12measures wonLeka Halasima

Games played: 18 for Jack Wighton, 20 for Leka Halasima. Compared positions: Centre.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRabbitohs logoJack WightonWarriors logoLeka Halasima
Tries per Game0.220.40Better
Try Assists per Game0.28Better0.10
Line Break Assists per Game0.33Better0.15
Points per Game0.91.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.220.35Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.613.60Better
Offloads per Game0.28Better0.20
Possessions per Game18.3Better11.9
Passes per Game5.4Better1.3
Run Metres per Game101.4Better90.8
Metres Gained per Game107.7Better90.8
Post-Contact Metres per Game33.637.7Better
Runs per Game12.4Better9.8
Metres per Run8.199.31Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.478.82Better
Tackles per Game12.418.1Better
Tackle Efficiency78.283.4Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.190.16Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.05Better0.08
Kick Returns per Game0.00.2Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.10.2Better
Games played1820