The verdict
Jack Howarth has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Howarth leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonJack Howarth43%of decided measures6measures wonJack Wighton
Games played: 17 for Jack Howarth, 18 for Jack Wighton. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Howarth |  Jack Wighton |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.35Better | 0.22 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.18 | 0.28Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.29 | 0.33Better |
| Points per Game | 1.4Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.29Better | 0.22 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.59Better | 1.61 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.59Better | 0.28 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0 | 18.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.0 | 5.4Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 126.4Better | 101.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 128.4Better | 107.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 44.6Better | 33.6 |
| Runs per Game | 14.9Better | 12.4 |
| Metres per Run | 8.49Better | 8.19 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.28Better | 7.47 |
| Tackles per Game | 11.6 | 12.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2Better | 78.2 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16Better | 0.19 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1Better | 0.0 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.1Better |
| Games played | 17 | 18 |