2026 NRL player comparison

Jack CoggervsLuke Hanson

Panthers · Five-Eighth versus Warriors · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Jack Cogger has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Cogger leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

12measures wonJack Cogger33%of decided measures6measures wonLuke Hanson

Games played: 16 for Jack Cogger, 7 for Luke Hanson. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricPanthers logoJack CoggerWarriors logoLuke Hanson
Tries per Game0.060.14Better
Try Assists per Game0.38Better0.29
Line Break Assists per Game0.130.43Better
Points per Game0.30.7Better
Line Breaks per Game0.000.00
Tackle Breaks per Game0.440.71Better
Offloads per Game0.25Better0.00
Possessions per Game40.0Better12.6
Passes per Game33.1Better9.7
Run Metres per Game35.6Better16.4
Metres Gained per Game133.0Better35.9
Post-Contact Metres per Game7.8Better5.3
Runs per Game4.6Better2.3
Metres per Run7.70Better7.19
Metres per Hit-Up10.50
Tackles per Game17.4Better8.4
Tackle Efficiency82.886.8Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.160.03Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.010.01
Kicks per Game3.4Better0.7
Kick Metres per Game97.4Better19.4
Games played167