2026 NRL player comparison

Harry GrantvsWayde Egan

Storm · Hooker versus Warriors · Hooker

Compare another player

The verdict

Harry Grant has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Harry Grant leads by 37%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

13measures wonHarry Grant37%of decided measures6measures wonWayde Egan

Games played: 21 for Harry Grant, 23 for Wayde Egan. Compared positions: Hooker.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricStorm logoHarry GrantWarriors logoWayde Egan
Tries per Game0.29Better0.13
Try Assists per Game0.430.48Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.380.65Better
Points per Game1.6Better0.5
Line Breaks per Game0.43Better0.26
Tackle Breaks per Game1.43Better0.43
Offloads per Game0.62Better0.52
Possessions per Game116.8Better98.7
Passes per Game109.5Better94.4
Run Metres per Game57.7Better52.1
Metres Gained per Game132.9Better54.5
Post-Contact Metres per Game10.011.2Better
Runs per Game8.0Better5.5
Metres per Run7.179.52Better
Metres per Hit-Up––
Tackles per Game39.8Better31.2
Tackle Efficiency90.691.8Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.070.07
Conversion Accuracy50.0–
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0–
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.010.00Better
Dummy-Half Runs per Game7.0Better4.8
Dummy-Half Metres per Game52.1Better46.7
Games played2123