The verdict
Harry Grant has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Harry Grant leads by 40%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonHarry Grant40%of decided measures6measures wonReece Robson
Games played: 21 for Harry Grant, 19 for Reece Robson. Compared positions: Hooker.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Harry Grant |  Reece Robson |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.29Better | 0.16 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.43Better | 0.21 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.38Better | 0.16 |
| Points per Game | 1.6Better | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.43Better | 0.21 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.43Better | 1.16 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.62Better | 0.32 |
| Possessions per Game | 116.8Better | 102.2 |
| Passes per Game | 109.5Better | 96.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 57.7Better | 56.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 132.9Better | 58.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 10.0 | 16.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.0Better | 5.6 |
| Metres per Run | 7.17 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 39.8 | 42.9Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.6 | 92.7Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07 | 0.06Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 50.0 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.00Better |
| Dummy-Half Runs per Game | 7.0Better | 4.5 |
| Dummy-Half Metres per Game | 52.1Better | 44.3 |
| Games played | 21 | 19 |