The verdict
Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow leads by 11%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
10measures wonHamiso Tabuai-Fidow11%of decided measures8measures wonScott Drinkwater
Games played: 19 for Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow, 24 for Scott Drinkwater. Compared positions: Fullback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow |  Scott Drinkwater |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.68Better | 0.42 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.53 | 0.96Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.74 | 1.13Better |
| Points per Game | 2.7 | 4.2Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.68Better | 0.42 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.63Better | 3.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.68 | 1.13Better |
| Possessions per Game | 36.3 | 49.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 21.4 | 30.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 171.7Better | 140.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 171.8 | 258.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.8Better | 31.8 |
| Runs per Game | 15.2 | 16.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 11.33Better | 8.39 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.09Better | 5.00 |
| Tackles per Game | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.9Better | 69.8 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22Better | 0.36 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 92.6 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 63.2Better | 47.6 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Games played | 19 | 24 |