The verdict
Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow leads by 55%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonHamiso Tabuai-Fidow55%of decided measures5measures wonJahream Bula
Games played: 19 for Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow, 21 for Jahream Bula. Compared positions: Fullback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow |  Jahream Bula |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.68Better | 0.29 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.53Better | 0.43 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.74Better | 0.62 |
| Points per Game | 2.7Better | 1.1 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.68Better | 0.29 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.63Better | 2.52 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.68 | 0.76Better |
| Possessions per Game | 36.3Better | 31.1 |
| Passes per Game | 21.4Better | 13.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 171.7Better | 159.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 171.8Better | 159.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.8Better | 45.1 |
| Runs per Game | 15.2 | 17.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 11.33Better | 9.20 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.09Better | 7.10 |
| Tackles per Game | 5.3 | 5.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.9Better | 73.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22Better | 0.28 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 5.0 | 5.4Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 63.2Better | 56.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.9 | 2.6Better |
| Games played | 19 | 21 |