The verdict
Zac Laybutt has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Zac Laybutt leads by 10%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonGrant Anderson10%of decided measures11measures wonZac Laybutt
Games played: 17 for Grant Anderson, 21 for Zac Laybutt. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Grant Anderson |  Zac Laybutt |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.24Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.12Better | 0.10 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Points per Game | 0.9Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.35Better | 0.24 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 1.05 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.29Better | 0.19 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.7 | 14.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.4 | 4.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 78.0 | 84.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 81.9 | 87.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 25.3 | 26.1Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.4 | 10.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.34 | 8.44Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.44 | 8.22Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.7 | 9.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2 | 81.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.21 | 0.17Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.0Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 6.8Better | 6.5 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6Better | 0.3 |
| Games played | 17 | 21 |