The verdict
Fletcher Sharpe has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Fletcher Sharpe leads by 100%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
20measures wonFletcher Sharpe100%of decided measures0measures wonReece Foley
Games played: 22 for Fletcher Sharpe, 6 for Reece Foley. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Fletcher Sharpe |  Reece Foley |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.55Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.50Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.73Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 2.2Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.59Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.18Better | 0.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.68Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 40.9Better | 2.0 |
| Passes per Game | 29.0Better | 1.3 |
| Run Metres per Game | 105.6Better | 2.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 140.4Better | 2.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 35.6Better | 0.7 |
| Runs per Game | 10.5Better | 0.7 |
| Metres per Run | 10.10Better | 4.25 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.50 | – |
| Tackles per Game | 17.5Better | 4.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.3Better | 77.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.09Better | 0.25 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.17 |
| Kicks per Game | 1.3Better | 0.0 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 34.8Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 22 | 6 |