The verdict
Fletcher Sharpe has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Fletcher Sharpe leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonFletcher Sharpe52%of decided measures5measures wonJack Cogger
Games played: 22 for Fletcher Sharpe, 16 for Jack Cogger. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Fletcher Sharpe |  Jack Cogger |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.55Better | 0.06 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.50Better | 0.38 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.73Better | 0.13 |
| Points per Game | 2.2Better | 0.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.59Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.18Better | 0.44 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.68Better | 0.25 |
| Possessions per Game | 40.9Better | 40.0 |
| Passes per Game | 29.0 | 33.1Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 105.6Better | 35.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 140.4Better | 133.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 35.6Better | 7.8 |
| Runs per Game | 10.5Better | 4.6 |
| Metres per Run | 10.10Better | 7.70 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.50 | 10.50Better |
| Tackles per Game | 17.5Better | 17.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.3Better | 82.8 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.09Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.01Better |
| Kicks per Game | 1.3 | 3.4Better |
| Kick Metres per Game | 34.8 | 97.4Better |
| Games played | 22 | 16 |