The verdict
Ezra Mam has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Ezra Mam leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonEzra Mam14%of decided measures9measures wonJack Cogger
Games played: 22 for Ezra Mam, 16 for Jack Cogger. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Ezra Mam |  Jack Cogger |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.45Better | 0.06 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.55Better | 0.38 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.50Better | 0.13 |
| Points per Game | 1.8Better | 0.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.64Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.77Better | 0.44 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.27Better | 0.25 |
| Possessions per Game | 31.5 | 40.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 21.8 | 33.1Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 80.0Better | 35.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 119.8 | 133.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 21.6Better | 7.8 |
| Runs per Game | 8.5Better | 4.6 |
| Metres per Run | 9.36Better | 7.70 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 11.50Better | 10.50 |
| Tackles per Game | 16.5 | 17.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 74.2 | 82.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.29 | 0.16Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.01Better |
| Kicks per Game | 2.0 | 3.4Better |
| Kick Metres per Game | 39.8 | 97.4Better |
| Games played | 22 | 16 |