The verdict
Moses Leota has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Moses Leota leads by 44%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonEmre Guler44%of decided measures13measures wonMoses Leota
Games played: 19 for Emre Guler, 24 for Moses Leota. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Emre Guler |  Moses Leota |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.05Better | 0.04 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.04Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.17Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.04Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.53 | 1.08Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.42 | 0.63Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.3 | 13.8Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 2.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 60.8 | 97.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 60.8 | 98.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 20.1 | 34.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.8 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.88 | 8.97Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.96Better | 8.69 |
| Tackles per Game | 23.8 | 25.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.2Better | 91.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04Better | 0.07 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.00Better | 0.02 |
| Games played | 19 | 24 |