The verdict
Daniel Tupou has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Daniel Tupou leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonDaniel Tupou36%of decided measures7measures wonMat Feagai
Games played: 14 for Daniel Tupou, 19 for Mat Feagai. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Daniel Tupou |  Mat Feagai |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.93Better | 0.26 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Points per Game | 3.7Better | 1.1 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.71Better | 0.47 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.93 | 2.05Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.50Better | 0.37 |
| Possessions per Game | 18.8Better | 13.6 |
| Passes per Game | 3.0Better | 2.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 142.6Better | 99.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 143.2Better | 100.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.9Better | 34.4 |
| Runs per Game | 14.3Better | 11.1 |
| Metres per Run | 9.98Better | 8.94 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.34 | 8.41Better |
| Tackles per Game | 1.6 | 7.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 65.7 | 76.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.39 | 0.23Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.03Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 3.5Better | 0.6 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 42.1Better | 5.9 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.2Better | 0.3 |
| Games played | 14 | 19 |