2026 NRL player comparison

Connor WatsonvsVictor Radley

Roosters · Lock versus Roosters · Lock

Compare another player

The verdict

Connor Watson has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Connor Watson leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

11measures wonConnor Watson22%of decided measures7measures wonVictor Radley

Games played: 24 for Connor Watson, 16 for Victor Radley. Compared positions: Lock.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRoosters logoConnor WatsonRoosters logoVictor Radley
Tries per Game0.040.06Better
Try Assists per Game0.08Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.130.13
Points per Game0.20.3Better
Line Breaks per Game0.04Better0.00
Tackle Breaks per Game1.08Better0.75
Offloads per Game0.33Better0.06
Possessions per Game27.5Better20.3
Passes per Game20.8Better11.0
Run Metres per Game55.978.2Better
Metres Gained per Game60.780.1Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game19.527.4Better
Runs per Game6.89.8Better
Metres per Run8.18Better8.02
Metres per Hit-Up9.19Better8.35
Tackles per Game25.931.8Better
Tackle Efficiency94.2Better87.9
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.04Better0.07
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.02Better0.03
Games played2416