2026 NRL player comparison

Connor TraceyvsDaniel Atkinson

Bulldogs · Fullback versus Dragons · Fullback

Compare another player

The verdict

Connor Tracey has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Connor Tracey leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

13measures wonConnor Tracey24%of decided measures8measures wonDaniel Atkinson

Games played: 22 for Connor Tracey, 23 for Daniel Atkinson. Compared positions: Fullback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricBulldogs logoConnor TraceyDragons logoDaniel Atkinson
Tries per Game0.18Better0.04
Try Assists per Game0.230.39Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.32Better0.30
Points per Game0.7Better0.2
Line Breaks per Game0.41Better0.22
Tackle Breaks per Game2.95Better1.78
Offloads per Game1.00Better0.52
Possessions per Game33.445.6Better
Passes per Game14.324.5Better
Run Metres per Game171.8Better61.0
Metres Gained per Game176.4568.7Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game41.8Better20.5
Runs per Game19.1Better7.3
Metres per Run9.00Better8.35
Metres per Hit-Up8.1710.67Better
Tackles per Game2.816.0Better
Tackle Efficiency63.376.8Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.500.21Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.030.03
Kick Returns per Game7.6Better1.5
Kick Return Metres per Game82.8Better14.5
Bombs Caught per Game1.9Better0.6
Games played2223