The verdict
Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonClint Gutherson24%of decided measures13measures wonHamiso Tabuai-Fidow
Games played: 17 for Clint Gutherson, 19 for Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow. Compared positions: Fullback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Clint Gutherson |  Hamiso Tabuai-Fidow |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.18 | 0.68Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.35 | 0.53Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.82Better | 0.74 |
| Points per Game | 0.7 | 2.7Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.24 | 0.68Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.24 | 3.63Better |
| Offloads per Game | 1.00Better | 0.68 |
| Possessions per Game | 39.7Better | 36.3 |
| Passes per Game | 22.3Better | 21.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 144.9 | 171.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 157.5 | 171.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 31.3 | 52.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 16.4Better | 15.2 |
| Metres per Run | 8.83 | 11.33Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.87 | 9.09Better |
| Tackles per Game | 6.1Better | 5.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 74.6 | 78.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.24 | 0.22Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 5.1Better | 5.0 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 53.5 | 63.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 2.1Better | 1.9 |
| Games played | 17 | 19 |