The verdict
Cameron McInnes has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Cameron McInnes leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
10measures wonCameron McInnes18%of decided measures7measures wonReuben Cotter
Games played: 17 for Cameron McInnes, 21 for Reuben Cotter. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Cameron McInnes |  Reuben Cotter |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.06 | 0.14Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.18Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.12Better | 0.10 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.12Better | 0.81 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.12 | 0.19Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.9Better | 12.5 |
| Passes per Game | 8.1Better | 3.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 75.9Better | 70.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.9Better | 70.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.2 | 27.5Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.1Better | 8.2 |
| Metres per Run | 7.55 | 8.51Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.86 | 8.86Better |
| Tackles per Game | 32.2 | 39.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.0Better | 88.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Games played | 17 | 21 |