2026 NRL player comparison

Braydon TrindallvsJack Cogger

Sharks · Five-Eighth versus Panthers · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Braydon Trindall has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Braydon Trindall leads by 40%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

14measures wonBraydon Trindall40%of decided measures6measures wonJack Cogger

Games played: 21 for Braydon Trindall, 16 for Jack Cogger. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBraydon TrindallPanthers logoJack Cogger
Tries per Game0.43Better0.06
Try Assists per Game1.24Better0.38
Line Break Assists per Game1.05Better0.13
Points per Game2.8Better0.3
Line Breaks per Game0.29Better0.00
Tackle Breaks per Game0.62Better0.44
Offloads per Game0.33Better0.25
Possessions per Game50.4Better40.0
Passes per Game32.133.1Better
Run Metres per Game34.635.6Better
Metres Gained per Game517.8Better133.0
Post-Contact Metres per Game6.57.8Better
Runs per Game4.8Better4.6
Metres per Run7.267.70Better
Metres per Hit-Up–10.50
Tackles per Game13.517.4Better
Tackle Efficiency84.5Better82.8
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.13Better0.16
Conversion Accuracy66.7–
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0–
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.01Better
Kicks per Game14.1Better3.4
Kick Metres per Game483.1Better97.4
Games played2116