2026 NRL player comparison

Braidon BurnsvsMat Feagai

Cowboys · Wing versus Dragons · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Braidon Burns has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Braidon Burns leads by 81%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

19measures wonBraidon Burns81%of decided measures2measures wonMat Feagai

Games played: 20 for Braidon Burns, 19 for Mat Feagai. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricCowboys logoBraidon BurnsDragons logoMat Feagai
Tries per Game0.75Better0.26
Try Assists per Game0.05Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.20Better0.05
Points per Game3.0Better1.1
Line Breaks per Game0.90Better0.47
Tackle Breaks per Game3.95Better2.05
Offloads per Game1.35Better0.37
Possessions per Game21.6Better13.6
Passes per Game2.12.1
Run Metres per Game173.9Better99.3
Metres Gained per Game173.9Better100.5
Post-Contact Metres per Game58.9Better34.4
Runs per Game19.1Better11.1
Metres per Run9.13Better8.94
Metres per Hit-Up8.96Better8.41
Tackles per Game5.77.0Better
Tackle Efficiency79.2Better76.4
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.20Better0.23
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.060.03Better
Kick Returns per Game2.4Better0.6
Kick Return Metres per Game24.7Better5.9
Bombs Caught per Game0.4Better0.3
Games played2019