The verdict
Beau Fermor has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Beau Fermor leads by 30%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonBeau Fermor30%of decided measures7measures wonJack Wighton
Games played: 23 for Beau Fermor, 18 for Jack Wighton. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Beau Fermor |  Jack Wighton |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.17 | 0.22Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.04 | 0.28Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.35Better | 0.33 |
| Points per Game | 0.7 | 0.9Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30Better | 0.22 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.83Better | 1.61 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.74Better | 0.28 |
| Possessions per Game | 16.1 | 18.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 5.4Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 112.9Better | 101.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 114.0Better | 107.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 46.0Better | 33.6 |
| Runs per Game | 13.9Better | 12.4 |
| Metres per Run | 8.14 | 8.19Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.56Better | 7.47 |
| Tackles per Game | 33.8Better | 12.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3Better | 78.2 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.19 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.1Better |
| Games played | 23 | 18 |