The verdict
Ata Mariota has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Ata Mariota leads by 6%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonAta Mariota6%of decided measures8measures wonReuben Cotter
Games played: 24 for Ata Mariota, 21 for Reuben Cotter. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Ata Mariota |  Reuben Cotter |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.08 | 0.14Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.3 | 0.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.10Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.46Better | 0.81 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.58Better | 0.19 |
| Possessions per Game | 11.3 | 12.5Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.8 | 3.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 89.7Better | 70.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 89.7Better | 70.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.4Better | 27.5 |
| Runs per Game | 10.1Better | 8.2 |
| Metres per Run | 8.86Better | 8.51 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.71 | 8.86Better |
| Tackles per Game | 28.4 | 39.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.0Better | 88.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 24 | 21 |