The verdict
Alofiana Khan-Pereira has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Alofiana Khan-Pereira leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira36%of decided measures7measures wonZac Laybutt
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 21 for Zac Laybutt. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira |  Zac Laybutt |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.10 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.24 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33Better | 1.05 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22Better | 0.19 |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1 | 14.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.6 | 4.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7Better | 84.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2Better | 87.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4Better | 26.1 |
| Runs per Game | 11.2Better | 10.0 |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 8.44 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 8.22Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9 | 9.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 81.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28 | 0.17Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9Better | 6.5 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5Better | 0.3 |
| Games played | 18 | 21 |