The verdict
Alofiana Khan-Pereira has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Alofiana Khan-Pereira leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonAlofiana Khan-Pereira33%of decided measures7measures wonSialetili Faeamani
Games played: 18 for Alofiana Khan-Pereira, 13 for Sialetili Faeamani. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Alofiana Khan-Pereira |  Sialetili Faeamani |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.89Better | 0.38 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.08 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.08 |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 1.5 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.06Better | 0.31 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.33 | 3.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.22 | 0.23Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.1Better | 13.8 |
| Passes per Game | 2.6Better | 1.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 107.7Better | 99.5 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 109.2Better | 99.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.4 | 36.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.2 | 11.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.65Better | 8.68 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.05 | 8.32Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.9Better | 3.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.0 | 75.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.28 | 0.26Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.8Better | 0.6 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.9Better | 5.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.5Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 18 | 13 |