The verdict
AJ Brimson has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, AJ Brimson leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonAJ Brimson43%of decided measures6measures wonNick Meaney
Games played: 22 for AJ Brimson, 20 for Nick Meaney. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  AJ Brimson |  Nick Meaney |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.27Better | 0.25 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.27Better | 0.15 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.23Better | 0.10 |
| Points per Game | 1.1 | 7.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45Better | 0.40 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.14Better | 2.05 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.32 | 0.80Better |
| Possessions per Game | 24.1Better | 16.5 |
| Passes per Game | 14.0Better | 3.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.0 | 92.4Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 115.0Better | 93.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.0Better | 30.3 |
| Runs per Game | 9.2 | 11.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.75Better | 7.86 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.39Better | 7.64 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.8Better | 12.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.9Better | 80.2 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 81.1 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.4Better |
| Games played | 22 | 20 |