The verdict
Viliame Kikau has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Viliame Kikau leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
10measures wonViliame Kikau5%of decided measures9measures wonZac Hosking
Games played: 15 for Viliame Kikau, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Viliame Kikau |  Zac Hosking |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.13 | 0.24Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 0.5 | 1.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.33Better | 0.19 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.67Better | 0.86 |
| Offloads per Game | 2.73Better | 0.90 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.2Better | 13.1 |
| Passes per Game | 2.9Better | 1.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 87.7 | 89.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 87.7 | 89.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 34.9Better | 31.3 |
| Runs per Game | 10.3 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.48Better | 8.17 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.03Better | 8.53 |
| Tackles per Game | 23.5 | 33.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 81.5 | 93.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.17 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 15 | 21 |