The verdict
Tom Dearden has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Tom Dearden leads by 78%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonTom Dearden78%of decided measures2measures wonZane Harrison
Games played: 13 for Tom Dearden, 15 for Zane Harrison. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Tom Dearden |  Zane Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.15Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 1.08Better | 0.40 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 1.31Better | 0.53 |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.1 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.46Better | 0.07 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.38Better | 0.33 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.15Better | 0.13 |
| Possessions per Game | 54.7Better | 36.1 |
| Passes per Game | 43.5Better | 26.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 86.1Better | 29.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 254.7Better | 239.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 24.2Better | 7.7 |
| Runs per Game | 10.5Better | 4.4 |
| Metres per Run | 8.17Better | 6.67 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 22.2Better | 16.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.7Better | 83.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Kicks per Game | 5.6 | 5.9Better |
| Kick Metres per Game | 168.9 | 210.4Better |
| Games played | 13 | 15 |