The verdict
Selwyn Cobbo has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Selwyn Cobbo leads by 73%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
19measures wonSelwyn Cobbo73%of decided measures3measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 18 for Selwyn Cobbo, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.94Better | 0.23 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.08 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.06Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 3.8Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.22Better | 0.77 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.89Better | 3.38 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.44Better | 0.08 |
| Possessions per Game | 22.6Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 4.0Better | 1.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 175.8Better | 108.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 181.8Better | 112.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 59.1Better | 34.0 |
| Runs per Game | 17.2Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 10.24Better | 9.96 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.37 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.6Better | 2.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.8Better | 79.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.20 | 0.19Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.10 | 0.05Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 4.1Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 44.9Better | 13.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.0Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 18 | 13 |