The verdict
Tevita Tatola has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Tevita Tatola leads by 76%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
2measures wonSam Tuivaiti76%of decided measures15measures wonTevita Tatola
Games played: 15 for Sam Tuivaiti, 24 for Tevita Tatola. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Sam Tuivaiti |  Tevita Tatola |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.00 | 0.08Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.0 | 0.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.04Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.53Better | 0.42 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.13Better | 0.04 |
| Possessions per Game | 10.1 | 14.2Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.2 | 1.1Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 75.2 | 106.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.2 | 106.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 25.4 | 39.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.7 | 12.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.78 | 8.35Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.23 | 8.05Better |
| Tackles per Game | 23.0 | 26.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.0 | 91.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 15 | 24 |