The verdict
Zac Hosking has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Zac Hosking leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonSalesi Foketi26%of decided measures12measures wonZac Hosking
Games played: 24 for Salesi Foketi, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Salesi Foketi |  Zac Hosking |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.13 | 0.24Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.08Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 0.5 | 1.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.13 | 0.19Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.21Better | 0.86 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.33 | 0.90Better |
| Possessions per Game | 7.3 | 13.1Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.1 | 1.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 54.6 | 89.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 54.6 | 89.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 22.0 | 31.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.0 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.10Better | 8.17 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.09Better | 8.53 |
| Tackles per Game | 16.4 | 33.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 93.8Better | 93.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.03Better | 0.04 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.02 |
| Games played | 24 | 21 |